Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Res Vestib Sci : Research in Vestibular Science

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Res Vestib Sci > Volume 16(4); 2017 > Article
Original Article
돌발성난청환자에서 양성돌발성두위현훈 발현의 예후는?
이예원, 남성일
What Is the Prognosis of Patients with Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss?
Yewon Lee, Sungil Nam
Research in Vestibular Science 2017;16(4):113-118.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21790/rvs.2017.16.4.113
Published online: December 15, 2017

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Keimyung University School of Medcine, Daegu, Korea

Corresponding Author: Sungil Nam Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Keimyung University School of Medcine, 56 Dalseong-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 41931, Korea Tel: +82-53-250-7715 Fax: +82-53-256-0325 E-mail: entnamsi@dsmc.or.kr
• Received: November 12, 2017   • Revised: November 27, 2017   • Accepted: December 9, 2017

Copyright © 2017 by The Korean Balance Society. All rights reserved.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 9,035 Views
  • 165 Download
  • 1 Crossref
  • Objectives
    Vertigo is considered a poor prognostic factor in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a common cause of vertigo and may accompany SSNHL. However, whether BPPV is a poor prognostic factor remains controversial. We identified features of prognostic utility in patients with both SSNHL and BPPV.
  • Methods
    We retrospectively evaluated data on all patients diagnosed with SSNHL at Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center between January 2011 and December 2015. We reviewed medical records, the results of vestibular function testing, and audiographic data.
  • Results
    Of the 524 idiopathic SSNHL patients, 20 (3.8%) were also diagnosed with unilateral BPPV. The average pure tone average (PTA) of those with both SSNHL and BPPV was higher than that of those without BPPV. Of the 471 patients with SSNHL only, 143 (30%) exhibited complete recovery. Of the 33 SSNHL patients with vertigo, 3 (9%) exhibited complete recovery, but only 3 (15%) of those with both SSNHL and BPPV exhibited complete recovery. Of the 20 patients with both SSNHL and BPPV, 15 had ipsilateral BPPV and 5 contralateral BPPV.
  • Conclusions
    Patients with BPPV had a higher average initial PTA score and poorer hearing recovery after treatment, than patients with SSNHL alone. Patients with contralateral BPPV had a somewhat better prognosis than those with ipsilateral BPPV, but statistical significance was not attained.
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (sudden SNHL) is defined as a loss ≥30 dB at ≥3 continuous frequencies within 72 hours [1]. The annual incidence of sudden SNHL ranges from 5 to 20 cases per 100,000 individuals in the USA [2]. Although neither the pathophysiology nor the cause of sudden SNHL has been fully determined, several factors are considered to affect recovery [3]. Such factors include the initial extent of hearing loss, the interval from sudden SNHL onset to treatment, age, the type of hearing loss, and vertigo [2,4-6]. The proportion of sudden SNHL accompanied by vertigo is 40%–60% [7-10]. Vestibular symptoms may reflect injury to the labyrinth or the eighth cranial nerve; concurrent vertigo is negatively prognostic [11].
Park et al. [12] reported that peripheral vestibulopathy was a useful prognostic factor in those with sudden SNHL; however, the prognostic significance of BPPV remains controversial. Here, we explore the association between recovery and BPPV status of sudden SNHL patients.
We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who were diagnosed with sudden SNHL from January 2011 to December 2015 at Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center.
Criteria of sudden SNHL includes hearing loss over 30 dB in more than 3 consecutive frequency in a pure tone audiogram in three days.
We excludes patients with delayed treatment over 2 weeks. Patients who had previous trauma or otologic surgery history or ototoxic drug use history were excluded too. All patient took brain magnetic resonance imaging and then cerebral lesion or vestibular shcwannoma were excluded.
Pure tone audiogram (PTA) was done at first visit and follow up pure tone audiogram were performed a week, a month and 3 months later. The PTA average was defined average hearing threshold at 500, 1 k, 2 k, 3 k Hz (AAO-HN) [13]. All patients were treated for sudden SNHL with prednisone (1 mg/kg/day, 12 days, tapering regimen). We compared first audiogram with 3 months later audiogram to analyze recovery.
To evaluate vertigo, every patients had vestibular function test at first visit.
Test includes spontaneous nystagmus, gaze nystagmus, head shaking and vibration nystagmus, positional nystagmus (Dix- Hallpike test, head rolling test). Video eye movement recording system (SLVNG, SLMed, Seoul, Korea) was used.
The patients who complaint dizziness when they experience difficulties in hearing were suspected of subjective vertigo.
Patients were divided three groups which include sudden SNHL only, sudden SNHL with BPPV, sudden SNHL with vertigo.
BPPV group includes patients who were suffered from any type of BPPV within 2 weeks after occurring sudden SNHL. Vertigo group means every patient who had subjective vertigo with vestibular hypofunction but without BPPV.
Head shaking test, head impulse test and caloric test were used to diagnosis the vestibular hypofunction.
The degree of hearing recovery was evaluated base on the Siegel’s criteria (complete recovery: final hearing better than 25 dB, Partial recovery: more than 15 dB gain, final hearing 25 to 45 dB, Slight improvement: more than 15 dB gain, final hearing poorer than 45 dB, No improvement: less than 15 dB gain, final hearing poorer than 75 dB) [14].
In this study, complete recovery and partial recovery were assigned to good recovery, slight improvement and no recovery were assigned to poor recovery.
Statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS software ver. 22.0 (SPSS Inc., an IBM company, Chicago, IL, USA) using independent t-test, pearson chi-square test, one way analysis of variance. A p-value <0.05 means statistically significant.
There are 524 patients who were diagnosed with sudden SNHL. 20 patients of them were suffered from BPPV. 33 patients had subjective vertigo and showed abnormal vestibular function. Average age were 56.4 years old. Of 524 patients, 258 patients were males and 266 were females. There were no statistical significance in average age and sex ratio among the three groups (sudden SNHL only, sudden SNHL with BPPV, sudden SNHL with vertigo) (Table 1).
Twenty patients had diverse BPPV types. Interestingly, 5 patients showed BPPV on opposite side ear (contralateral BPPV). Whirling vertigo symptom of contralateral BPPV attacked on the same day when they felt sudden hearing difficulty. There was no difficulty in diagnosing BPPV.
All of five contralateral BPPV were lateral canal type. 3 cases were geotrohpics and 2 cases were apogeotropics.
Another 15 BPPV cases occurred on the same side ear with sudden SNHL. The posterior canal type were 6 cases and geotropic lateral canal were 5, apogeotropic lateral canal were 4 (Table 2, Fig. 1).
The Patients who had ipsilateral BPPV showed worse average PTA than the contralateral BPPV patients. In the case of ipsilateral BPPV, initial average PTA was 88.2 dB and after 3 months later post treatment average PTA was 73.5 dB. The initial average PTA of contralateral BPPV was 80.2 dB and post treatment was 58.2 dB. There was even more difference in post treatment PTA, but no statistically significant difference (Fig. 2).
Compared with sudden SNHL only group, patients with ipsilateral side BPPV and with subjective vertigo were reported worse initial average PTA and post treatment average PTA. These difference has statistical significance (p<0.05). The initial average PTA of sudden SNHL only group was 68.9 dB, and group with ipsilateral BPPV was 88.2 dB, group with subjective vertigo was 77.4 dB.
The post treatment average PTA of sudden SNHL only group was 43.6 dB and 73.5 dB for BPPV group and 63.2 dB for subjective vertigo group (Fig. 3). Groups who had ipsilateral BPPV and subjective vertigo showed statistically significant better initial PTA and post treatment PTA than sudden SNHL only group. But there was no statistical significance between ipsilateral BPPV group and vertigo group.
Sudden SNHL only group showed high proportion of complete recovery (n=143, 30.4%) compared with other groups. BPPV group showed high proportion of no improvement (n=7, 35.0%) and slight improvement (n=8, 40.0%), vertigo group showed high no improvement (n=16, 48.4%) proportion too (Table 3).
In the case of good recovery, there is statistical difference between sudden SNHL group and BPPV group or subjective vertigo group but there was no statistic difference between BPPV and subjective vertigo groups (Table 4).
Vertigo is known to be poorly prognostic, but commonly encountered in sudden SNHL patients [15]. Vertigo is not a disease, but rather a symptom; our focus was on BPPV, which commonly causes peripheral vertigo accompanied by sudden SNHL. BPPV could cause by migration of otoloith into semicircular canals, it might be a factor that means severe labyrinth damage [11]. Thus, sudden SNHL patients with BPPV may exhibit more severe labyrinth damage associated with poorer recovery then we could suppose that these patients would show poor recovery.
Hypoperfusion of the inner ear, thought potentially to cause sudden SNHL in patients under prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass therapy, may also explain the sudden SNHL of BPPV patients [16,17]. Baloh and Honrubia [18] found that vascular occlusion of the inner ear caused the release of otoconia from macular utricles. Transient labyrinthine ischemia may trigger patchy loss of inner ear function, associated with sudden SNHL and BPPV/vertigo [17].
Viral infection may also trigger sudden SNHL combined with BPPV, inflaming and damaging the labyrinth, accompanied by vestibulopathy and Bell’s palsy [19,20]. Karlberg et al. [20] considered that viral infection of the labyrinth might trigger BPPV.
We studied 20 patients (3.8% of the total) with both sudden SNHL and BPPV. Of these, 15 (2.9%) exhibited BPPV on the same side as hearing loss and 5 (0.1%) BPPV on the other side. All contralateral BPPV attacks developed within 24 hours after sudden SNHL. BPPV diagnosis was not difficult.
In the case of contralateral ear BPPV, exact pathophysiology and effect on hearing loss were out of scope in our study.
It is possible that viral infection may affect the contralateral ear, triggering BPPV. But we couldn’t rule out the possibility of accident event. It is difficult to confirm the exact pathophysiology.
Sudden SNHL with BPPV groups clearly exhibited poorer initial hearing and recovery than sudden SNHL only group.
Compared to contralateral BPPV group, ipsilateral BPPV group had poorer initial hearing and recovery result, but there were no statistical significant.
We supposed that ipsilateral BPPV could be a worse prognosis factor than contralateral BPPV, but statistical significant were insufficient to reach that conclusion.
The group with BPPV and vertigo had poor recovery than the sudden SNHL only group. All of these factors which including BPPV or vestibulopathy (vertigo group) could indicate worse initial PTA result too.
The initial hearing threshold is undisputed prognostic factor in hearing outcome [21]. We thought that BPPV may reflect more severe labyrinthine damage, so could induce poor initial hearing. Then it could become a poor prognosis factor. It is already known that sudden SNHL patients with vestibulopathy (sudden SNHL with vertigo group) have a poor prognosis.
Lateral semicircular canal type BPPV was more common in sudden SNHL patients with BPPV [10]. However, we found no significant difference among BPPV types. Lee and Ban [22] reported that subtypes of BPPV couldn’t influence on the hearing outcome, just reflect serious labyrinthine damage on canals.
In conclusion, BPPV may be poorly prognostic of sudden SNHL associated with severe, widespread labyrinthine damage which could indicate worse initial hearing. Further research is needed for pathophysiology and relationship with contralateral BPPV.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig. 1.
The proportion of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo types.
rvs-16-4-113f1.gif
Fig. 2.
Comparison of average PTA between ipsilateral BPPV and contralateral BPPV. PAT, pure tone average; BPPV, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
rvs-16-4-113f2.gif
Fig. 3.
Change of the average PTA between initial visit and post treatment (post Tx: 3 month later). (A) Patients group who had BPPV shows poorer initial PTA and post treatment PTA than sudden SNHL only group. (B) Patients group who had sudden SNHL with vertigo shows poorer initial PTA and poorer post treatment (post Tx: 3 month later) PTA than sudden SNHL only group. both (A), (B) had statistically significant (p<0.05). PAT, pure tone average; BPPV, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo; SNHL, sensorineural hearing loss.
rvs-16-4-113f3.gif
Table 1.
Characteristics of patients who had sudden sensorinueral hearing loss
Characteristic Total patients (%) (n=524) Sex ratio (male:female) p-value Age (SD) p-value
SSNHL only 471 (89.9) 235:236 >0.05 56.4 (15.7) >0.05
SSNHL+BPPV 20 (3.8) 11:9 55.5 (15.2)
SSNHL+vertigo 33 (6.3) 11:22 56.4 (15.8)

SD, standard deviation; SSNHL, sudden sensorineural hering loss; BPPV, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Table 2.
Subtypes of BPPV
Affected ear Posterior BPPV Lateral BPPV (geotropic) Lateral BPPV (apogeotropic) Total
Ipsilateral 6 5 4 15
Contralateral 0 3 2 5

BPPV, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Table 3.
Recovery proportion of three groups according to Siegel’s criteria
Siegel's grade SSNHL only (%) SSNHL with BPPV (%) SSNHL with vertigo (%) Total
Complete recovery 143 (30.4) 3 (15.0) 3 (9.1) 149
Partial recovery 61 (13.0) 2 (10.0) 3 (9.1) 66
Slight improvement 85 (18.0) 8 (40.0) 11 (33.4) 104
No improvement 182 (38.6) 7 (35.0) 16 (48.4) 205

SSNHL, sudden sensorineural hering loss; BPPV, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Table 4.
Comparison of recovery prognosis
Group Recovery
p-value
Good recovery (%) Poor recovery (%) Total
SSNHL only 204 (43.3) 267 (56.7) 471 0.03a)
SSNHL(+) BPPV(+) 5 (6.7) 15 (93.3) 20
SSNHL only 204 (43.3) 267 (56.7) 471 <0.01a)
SSNHL(+) Vertigo(+) 6 (18.2) 27 (81.8) 33

SSNHL only, sudden sensorineural hearing loss only group; SSNHL, sudden sensorineural hearing loss; BPPV, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo; SSNHL(+) BPPV(+), sudden sensorineural hearing loss with BPPV group; SSNHL(+) Vertigo(+), sudden sensorinueral hearing loss with vertigo group.

a) Stastistically significant.

  • 1. Wilson WR. The relationship of the herpesvirus family to sudden hearing loss: a prospective clinical study and literature review. Laryngoscope 1986;96:870–7.ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Byl FM Jr. Sudden hearing loss: eight years' experience and suggested prognostic table. Laryngoscope 1984;94:647–61.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Jo SY, Lee S, Eom TH, Jeun ES, Cho HH, Cho YB. Outcomes of Severe to Profound Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2015;8:206–10.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 4. Ceylan A, Celenk F, Kemaloglu YK, Bayazit YA, Goksu N, Ozbilen S. Impact of prognostic factors on recovery from sudden hearing loss. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:1035–40.ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Cvorovic L, Deric D, Probst R, Hegemann S. Prognostic model for predicting hearing recovery in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:464–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 6. Jun HJ, Chang J, Im GJ, Kwon SY, Jung H, Choi J. Analysis of frequency loss as a prognostic factor in idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 2012;132:590–6.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Hallberg OE. Sudden deafness of obscure origin. Laryngoscope 1956;66:1237–67.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Shaia FT, Sheehy JL. Sudden sensori-neural hearing impairment: a report of 1,220 cases. Laryngoscope 1976;86:389–98.ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Pajor A, Gryczynski M, Lukomski M. Vertigo and vestibular disorders in patients treated from sudden deafness. Otolaryngol Pol 1997;51 Suppl 25:256–8.PubMed
  • 10. Kim YH, Kim KS, Choi H, Choi JS, Han CD. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo is not a prognostic factor in sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;146:279–82.ArticlePubMed
  • 11. Song JJ, Yoo YT, An YH, Yoo JC, Kim JS, Koo JW. Comorbid benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: an ominous sign for hearing recovery. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:137–41.ArticlePubMed
  • 12. Park HM, Jung SW, Rhee CK. Vestibular diagnosis as prognostic indicator in sudden hearing loss with vertigo. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2001;545:80–3.ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Monsell EM. New and revised reporting guidelines from the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:176–8.ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Siegel LG. The treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1975;8:467–73.ArticlePubMed
  • 15. El-Saied S, Joshua BZ, Segal N, Kraus M, Kaplan DM. Sudden hearing loss with simultaneous posterior semicircular canal BPPV: possible etiology and clinical implications. Am J Otolaryngol 2014;35:180–5.ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Phillipps JJ, Thornton AR. Audiometric changes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Br J Audiol 1996;30:19–25.ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Schuknecht HF, Ruby RR. Cupulolithiasis. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1973;20:434–43.ArticlePubMed
  • 18. Baloh RW, Honrubia V. Childhood onset of benign positional vertigo. Neurology 1998;50:1494–6.ArticlePubMed
  • 19. Arbusow V, Schulz P, Strupp M, Dieterich M, von Reinhardstoettner A, Rauch E, et al. Distribution of herpes simplex virus type 1 in human geniculate and vestibular ganglia: implications for vestibular neuritis. Ann Neurol 1999;46:416–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Karlberg M, Halmagyi GM, Buttner U, Yavor RA. Sudden unilateral hearing loss with simultaneous ipsilateral posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a variant of vestibulo-cochlear neurolabyrinthitis? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:1024–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Hong SM, Yeo SG. Clinical analysis of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Acta Otolaryngol 2013;133:439–42.ArticlePubMed
  • 22. Lee NH, Ban JH. Is BPPV a prognostic factor in idiopathic sudden sensory hearing loss? Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2010;3:199–202.ArticlePubMedPMC

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Which Is More Important for the Prognosis of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Vertigo, Canal Paresis or Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo?
      Yong-Hwi An, Hyun Joon Shim
      Research in Vestibular Science.2021; 20(3): 101.     CrossRef

    • PubReader PubReader
    • ePub LinkePub Link
    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      What Is the Prognosis of Patients with Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss?
      Res Vestib Sci. 2017;16(4):113-118.   Published online December 15, 2017
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Figure
    We recommend
    Related articles

    Res Vestib Sci : Research in Vestibular Science