KBS
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Original Articles
- Difference of Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials between Bone-Conduction and Air-Conduction in Patients with Nonspecific Dizziness
- Yong-Hwi An, Jung Ho Choi, Seung Yeon Jeon, Hyun Joon Shim
- Res Vestib Sci. 2022;21(4):93-98. Published online December 15, 2022
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.21790/rvs.2022.21.4.93
- 1,674 View
- 47 Download
-
Abstract
PDF - Objectives
This study was performed to evaluate the difference of the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) stimulated by bone-conduction (BC) and air-conduction (AC) in patients with nonspecific dizziness.
Methods
Twenty-eight dizzy patients (56 ears) and 15 subjects (30 ears) as normal control was enrolled. Responses of BC- and AC-cVEMP were recorded sequentially in both groups. cVEMP parameters including latencies, inter-latencies intervals, amplitudes, and interaural amplitude asymmetry were analyzed and compared.
Results
Among the patients with nonspecific dizziness, AC-cVEMP responses were clearly detected in all 56 ears while BC-cVEMP responses were detected in 32 ears (57.1%). Amplitudes of BC-cVEMP were significantly smaller than those of AC-cVEMP in all patients with BC-cVEMP response. There was no difference in latencies, inter-latencies intervals, and interaural amplitude asymmetry ratios between BC- and AC-cVEMP. There was no significant difference in BCand AC-cVEMP between the dizzy and control groups.
Conclusions
BC-cVEMP is not clinically useful in comparison to AC-cVEMP for the evaluation of nonspecific dizziness. An effective stimulation tool for BC is necessary to provoke more reliable responses of BC-cVEMP.
- Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential in Patients With Vestibular Neuritis and Acute Viral Labyrinthitis
- Il Ha Moon, Chan Goo Lee, Moo Kyun Park, Jong Dae Lee
- Res Vestib Sci. 2012;11(3):92-96.
- 2,809 View
- 99 Download
-
Abstract
- Background and Objectives: Vestibular neuritis predominantly affects the superior branch of the vestibular nerve, resulting in vertigo. Acute viral labyrinthitis occurs when an infection affects both vestibulo-cochlear nerve and labyrinth, resulting in hearing changes as well as vertigo. The purpose of study is to identify there is a difference of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) in patients with vestibular neuritis and acute viral labyrinthitis. Materials and Methods: cVEMP and oVEMP tests using 500-Hz tone-burst stimuli were performed on patients with vestibular neuritis and acute viral labyrinthitis. Pure tone audiometry, caloric test and subjective visual vertical (SVV) were performed in all patients. We compared the VEMP results, SVV, caloric test in patients with vestibular neuritis and acute viral labyrinthitis. Results: Abnormal cVEMP responses were detected in 2 (20%) patients with vestibular neuritis and 5 (100%) patients with labyrinthitis. Abnormal oVEMP responses were detected in 9 patients (90%) with vestibular neuritis and 5 (100%) patients with labyrinthitis. oVEMP abnormalities is correlated with caloric test and subjective visual vertical in patients with vestibular neuritis and labyrinthits. Conclusion: Our results shows that the response of cVEMP and oVEMP between patients with vestibular neuritis and acute viral labyrinthitis is different. We can infer that oVEMP response to air-conducted sound is different vestibular origin compared to cVEMP and may originate from utricle.
First
Prev
